Opinion: Palash Baruah and D. L. Wankhar
Claims and counter-claims have characterized the debate about the scenario of employment and unemployment in the country. Both Government and private agencies shell out various shades of data and information to prove a point. Going by the official data set it is seen that Government collects and collate employment data using various methodologies one of them is in the form of Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS). The Survey provides annual and quarterly indicators of employment and unemployment. It throws up some interesting and intriguing dimensions which deserves discussion. We had a look at the unit level PLFS data for the period 2017-18 and 2019-20.
Employment rate and its growth
The overall employment rate was in the steady range of around 47 percent to 51 percent in time period of 2017-18 to 2019-20 implying that half of the persons in the age group of 15 and above are employed in one form or the other.
However drilling down the employment rate data we found some chilling revelation. The employment rate amongst females is a third of males’ employment rate in the period of 2017-18 to 2019-20. In other words for every three employed males there is only one employed female. The stark difference is undeniable depressing. Here the usual rural-urban dichotomy is absent – similar pattern of lower employment rate among females existed in both rural and urban areas. Low rate of female participation in the work force is still the dominant factor in the Indian employment scenario.
Table: Percentage distribution of growth rate
Looking at the growth in the overall employment rate it is seen that it grew at around 9 percent in 2019-20 over 2017-18. Interestingly this growth was spearheaded by the growth in females’ employment rate. It grew by around 31 percent as against a mere 3 percent growth in males’ employment rate. This is something to cheer about and is a positive development albeit the fact that it happened in the background of low employment rate amongst females.
Curiously digging further into the employment data we found that the phenomenal growth in females’ employment rate was largely driven by the rise in female unpaid family workers. Female unpaid household members are those who assisted in the operation of an economic activity in the household farm or non-farm activities. This category of female workers grew at 49 percent in the rural areas and at 17 percent in the urban areas. The question that begs us is whether we are entering a scenario where female unpaid workers are heavily contributing to economic activity without being getting paid for and hence does nothing to enhance their financial status? We are not hazarding any guess at this moment. It would require some more indept analysis.
Our current findings can be summed up something like this – (i) the overall employment rate in the country is around 50 percent but females’ employment rate is only a third of males’ employment rate and (ii) increasing growth in females’ employment rate is largely being contributed by female unpaid workers. If this phenomenon persists then timely and adequate policy initiatives should be put in place to compensate these female unpaid workers to enhance and strengthen their financial well-being. Their productive contribution to economic activity should not go unremunerated financially.
Dr. Palash Baruah is Senior Research Analyst National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER) New Delhi and Mr. D. L. Wankhar is a retired Indian Economic Service Officer Views and opinions expressed in this article are personal.